[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISSUE: DEFSTRUCT-REDEFINITION



    Programming environments are allowed, encouraged, etc. to allow such
    redefinition, perhaps with warning messages. It is beyond the scope of
    the language standard to define those interactions, except to note
    that they are not portable.  I don't think it is a cop-out. I
    certainly don't want an error to be signalled.  I'm lacking a good
    terminology for describing the "is an error" situation that I think
    this should be.
    
Why not "is non-portable"?