[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: HASH-TABLE-ACCESS (version 1)

To: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com
Subject: Issue: HASH-TABLE-ACCESS (version 1)
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 88 15:48 EDT
Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: <8809131930.AA14068@decwrl.dec.com>

I don't see anything immediately wrong with this, but I have a vague
recollection that the cleanup committee discussed and rejected a
similar proposal once before.  If so, we should find out why.
Could it be that it's not clear precisely what some of these values
mean?

References:
- Issue: HASH-TABLE-ACCESS (version 1)
  - From: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com

Prev by Date: Re: issue TRUENAME-SYNTAX-ONLY
Next by Date: not about Issue: HASH-TABLE-ACCESS (version 1)
Previous by thread: not about Issue: HASH-TABLE-ACCESS (version 1)
Next by thread: Issue: HASH-TABLE-ACCESS (version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread