[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: LOAD-TIME-EVAL (Version 5)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: LOAD-TIME-EVAL (Version 5)
- From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 88 16:30 PDT
- Cc: Masinter.PA@Xerox.COM, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- Fcc: BD:>Gregor>mail>outgoing-mail-4.text.newest
- In-reply-to: <880917192102.0.KMP@GRYPHON.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Line-fold: no
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 88 19:21 EDT
From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
The CL-Compiler committee has been actively discussing this, so I think
we can safely ignore it for the time being.
If they fail to reach closure and submit something to X3J13 in a timely
fashion, I will take care of reviving it here.
Given the current X3J13 schedule, what does timely mean? Is there
reason to believe the compiler committee will arrive in Washington with
a detailed proposal that they want the full committee to vote on? If
not, the cleanup committee should probably generate its own proposal
now.
-------