Re: Issue: EQUAL-STRUCTURE (Version 4)

[Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>]

    Date: 1 Oct 88 16:10 PDT
    From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
    ... I would object to a statement in the Discussion ...

I assume you mean "wouldn't".

Ok, put it in the discussion. I'm not hot on making it imperative. I just
wanted it clearly marked for Kathy to find.

If you do that, and make the "instance" change, you can go ahead and count
me as supporting the proposal.