[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 5 Oct 88 20:43 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Wed, 5 Oct 88 23:30 EDT
It would be just as easy to say that if duplicate tags are present, the
first one takes precedent. I'd say that along the lines of performance,
implementation cost, readability that its a wash and that the aesthetics
are slightly improved.