[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)

To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 88 16:00 EDT
Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: <881005233028.2.KMP@BOBOLINK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

TAGBODY-CONTENTS:FORBID-EXTENSION is fine.

I hope it's clear enough that it is -not- an error to have
duplicate tags in a TAGBODY if no one goes to them.  This is
implied but not stated explicitly within the body of the proposal.

References:
- Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)
  - From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue: PRINT-PRETTY-HOOK (version 1)
Next by Date: Issue: ARRAY-TYPE-ELEMENT-TYPE-SEMANTICS (version 5)
Previous by thread: Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)
Next by thread: Re: Issue: TAGBODY-CONTENTS (Version 4)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread