[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)

To: gls@Think.COM
Subject: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
From: Jim McDonald <jlm@lucid.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 88 12:33:16 PDT
Cc: KMP@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com, CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: gls@Think.COM's message of Wed, 5 Oct 88 10:26:46 EDT <8810051426.AA26682@joplin.think.com>

    My only complaint about this is that I use REMOVE-IF-NOT much more
    frequently than REMOVE-IF.
    --Guy

Maybe we should add KEEP-IF :-)

I could even get serious if we called it ABSTRACT.

 jlm

References:
- Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
  - From: gls@Think.COM

Prev by Date: Issue: FUNCTION-TYPE-ARGUMENT-TYPE-SEMANTICS (version 2)
Next by Date: Re: Issue: PRINT-PRETTY-HOOK (version 1)
Previous by thread: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
Next by thread: Re: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread