[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)

To: KMP@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com
Subject: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
From: gls@Think.COM
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 88 10:26:46 EDT
Cc: CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman's message of Sun, 2 Oct 88 21:34 EDT <881002213452.4.KMP@GRYPHON.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

   Date: Sun, 2 Oct 88 21:34 EDT
   From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com>
   ...
   Issue:          TEST-NOT-IF-NOT
   ...

My only complaint about this is that I use REMOVE-IF-NOT much more
frequently than REMOVE-IF.
--Guy

Follow-Ups:
- Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
  - From: Jim McDonald <jlm@lucid.com>

References:
- Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
  - From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue: LIST-TYPE-SPECIFIER (Version 1)
Next by Date: Issue: FUNCTION-COMPOSITION (Version 2)
Previous by thread: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
Next by thread: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread