Re: Issue: PRINT-PRETTY-HOOK (version 1)

[Dan L. Pierson <pierson%mist@multimax.ARPA>]

    		 Once that's clear a name can be chosen.  Possibly the
    	feature already exists in the language, via a :AROUND method
    	on PRINT-OBJECT with no specialized parameters, depending on whether
    	what that does is precisely what you wanted.
    
        Does it do what I want (I'm not yet a CLOS theologian)?
    
    Yes.
    
    I think this means we can withdraw the PRINT-PRETTY-HOOK proposal, since
    Common Lisp as amended by CLOS already will do what you want.

OK, consider it withdrawn UNLESS CLOS is later voted optional (which I
will not support).