[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: HASH-TABLE-PACKAGE-GENERATORS (version 3)
- To: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Subject: Issue: HASH-TABLE-PACKAGE-GENERATORS (version 3)
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 88 13:05 EDT
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <8810080425.AA03150@bhopal>
As Kent pointed out, the new example doesn't make any sense. Also
I still think the with-package-iterator syntax isn't right. The way
you have it now, there is a required argument <package> which by
default is ignored! Richard's idea of using keyword arguments is
a good one, but something is still a little bit off. I think everything
else is okay.