[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: TAILP-NIL (version 3)
- To: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com
- Subject: Issue: TAILP-NIL (version 3)
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 88 15:17 EDT
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <8804200233.AA01883@decwrl.dec.com>
as you might expect, i support this writeup and the stated
proposal (TAILP-NIL:T).
do i take it from the fact that you removed the NIL proposal that you
also endorse it? your writeup is devoid of recommendations in the
Discussion.