[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: DEFSTRUCT-ACCESS-FUNCTIONS (Version 1)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: DEFSTRUCT-ACCESS-FUNCTIONS (Version 1)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 10 Nov 88 15:55 PST
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Thu, 10 Nov 88 13:33 EST
I don't see what the problem is. Why is "It is left up to the
implementation whether or not the DEFSTRUCT access
function is declared inline." a problem at all?