[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)

To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Subject: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)
From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 88 18:55 EST
Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
In-reply-to: <881123-144300-13354@Xerox>

I have some concerns about your alternate proposal but my mind is not
closed. I need more time to study this alternative and would like to
postpone dealing with this issue until after the letter ballot, instead
targeting a mailing in time for an in-person vote in January.

References:
- Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)
  - From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM

Prev by Date: Issue: PATHNAME-SUBDIRECTORY-LIST (Version 2)
Next by Date: Issue: PATHNAME-SUBDIRECTORY-LIST (Version 2)
Previous by thread: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)
Next by thread: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread