[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-CANONICAL-TYPE (Version 1)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 9 Apr 89 22:47 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Wed, 23 Nov 88 18:55 EST
You said:
"I have some concerns about your alternate proposal but my mind is not
closed. I need more time to study this alternative and would like to
postpone dealing with this issue until after the letter ballot, instead
targeting a mailing in time for an in-person vote in January.
"
I still like my alternative proposal, which is just a smaller,
but useful, subset.