[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 4)

To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 4)
From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: 2 Dec 88 09:43 PST
Cc: SEB1525@draper.com, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Fri, 2 Dec 88 04:16 EST

This gives me a reason for wanting to disallow non-lists as the first
argument to TAILP -- that it would have to use EQL to be consistent.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 4)
  - From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 4)
  - From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>

Prev by Date: Issue: TYPE-OF-UNDERCONSTRAINED (Version 1)
Next by Date: Re: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 4)
Previous by thread: Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 4)
Next by thread: Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 4)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread