Re: [David A. Moon: Issue: HASH-TABLE-PACKAGE-GENERATORS (version 5)]

[cperdue@Sun.COM (Cris Perdue)]

>     , and that it is not
>     possible to prevent the user from defining a local function,
>     so no problems are avoided.
> 
> I don't understand this part of your comment.

I see that the proposal refers to the possibilities I was thinking
of:

"It is unspecified what happens if any of the implicit interior
state of an iteration is returned outside the dyamic extent of the
WITH-... form (such as by retuning some closure over the invocation form)."