[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: REAL-NUMBER-TYPE (version 1)
- To: Robert A. Cassels <Cassels@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: REAL-NUMBER-TYPE (version 1)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 6 Jan 89 14:51 PST
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@Sail.Stanford.EDU, DySak@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, JGA@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, Common-Lisp-Implementors@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
- In-reply-to: Robert A. Cassels <Cassels@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Fri, 6 Jan 89 17:36 EST
The proposal should make REAL a CLOS class too, I think, rather than just
allowing that to be done.