Re: Cleanup Issue Status

[Dan L. Pierson <pierson@mist.encore.com>]

    Date: Wed, 15 Mar 89 11:06:53 EST
    From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
    To: masinter.pa@xerox.com
    Cc: chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
    Subject: Cleanup Issue Status
    
    
       > >+ FUNCTION-COMPOSITION
       > >Synopsis: Add new functions
       > >Version 5, 10-Feb-89 
       > >Status: Passed (as amended) Jan 89 X3J13
       > I know this is picky, but I thought it was decided to fail this one
       > completely and amend TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (I believe that was the related
       > issue).
    
       -- you may be right. I wish we had minutes. I guess I'll stick by my
       summary unless I hear otherwise.
    
    My notes show that the COMPLEMENT function was accepted and
    all other parts of the proposal failed.
    --Guy
    
My memory agrees with Guy's notes.  We did spend several sessions on
this one and the waters got rather muddy at times.