[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: PRETTY-PRINT-INTERFACE (Version 1)
- To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM, Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Subject: Issue: PRETTY-PRINT-INTERFACE (Version 1)
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 89 12:28 EST
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <890314-170500-2365@Xerox>
- Line-fold: No
If you're thinking about making a new version, I intend to comment on
this, but it's so huge that it's taking a long time. A very brief
summary of some of my likely comments is: I'm in favor of the general
idea of defining a standard pretty printer, but there are some problems
in the details of this proposal; part of this seems to resemble CLOS,
but is gratuitously(?) different; there doesn't seem to be any
concession to variable-width fonts, although I didn't find an explicit
statement of what units indentation and width are measured in; I wish to
God that Dick Waters hated FORMAT, because the grotesque FORMAT-based
syntax is going to make this a lot harder to pass.