[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issue PROCLAIM-LEXICAL (Version 9)
- To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Re: issue PROCLAIM-LEXICAL (Version 9)
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 89 12:29 EST
- Cc: Jeff Dalton <jeff%aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK>, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <890316-082748-3893@Xerox>
- Line-fold: No
Date: 16 Mar 89 08:27 PST
From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Does anyone at least have a record of the amendments that were proposed at
the last meeting. In lieu of a new version, we are probably obligated to
put version 9, as amended, on the table.
Maybe I shouldn't take this attitude, but I will anyway. I have brief
notes on the amendments that were proposed, but since I think all of them
were wrongheaded and braindamaged, I'm not going to help anyone remember
them. Only one of the amendments was actually voted on, so we're certainly
free to forget the other two.