[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issue PROCLAIM-LEXICAL (Version 9)
- To: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: issue PROCLAIM-LEXICAL (Version 9)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 16 Mar 89 10:02 PST
- Cc: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM, Jeff Dalton <jeff%aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK>, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Thu, 16 Mar 89 12:29 EST
What I meant to ask was: what amendments actually passed? If none, then we
can just bring up version 9 again. I think we can certainly ignore
amendments that were were voted on and failed or did not come far enough to
get to a vote.