[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: PACKAGE-FUNCTION-CONSISTENCY
- To: KMP@Symbolics.COM
- Subject: Re: Issue: PACKAGE-FUNCTION-CONSISTENCY
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 9 Apr 89 22:38 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: KMP%STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics:COM:Xerox's message of 4 Apr 89 12:31 PDT
I believe the status is that David mailed a Version 4 which contained the
correct wording for what was passed at the Jan 89 X3J13. I don't think we
need to discuss it again. I had it on the agenda because I knew my Version
3 was incorrect or cloudy.
I'm marking it "Passed, as amended, Jan 89 X3j13".