[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue SAFE-CODE, version 1

To: cl-compiler@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
Subject: Re: issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
From: ROSENKING@A.ISI.EDU
Date: 13 Mar 1989 16:14-EST
In-reply-to: <8903131726.AA02193@defun.utah.edu>
Sender: ROSENKING@A.ISI.EDU

I believe that the basis for this proposal is well justified and I support
the intent of what is being defined. I'm not 100% for the naming though.
Anyhow, I have seen these type of problems come up before in implementations
of C and FORTRAN, where it was unclear what the default values were for
OPTIMIZE and DEBUG are and so I agree that some known universal default
should be specified, though perhaps by a name besides SAFE-CODE.

    Jeff Rosenking

Follow-Ups:
- Re: issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
  - From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: issue MACRO-ENVIRONMENT-EXTENT, version 2
Next by Date: Issue: LOAD-OBJECTS (Version 3)
Previous by thread: issue SYNTACTIC-ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS, version 4
Next by thread: Re: issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread