[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


    	Actually, now I'm also a bit confused.  Since we passed the
    	FUNCTION-TYPE proposal, is the second argument to COMPILE
    	supposed to be a lambda expression or a function?  Should I
    	have said (compile nil (source-code f)) ?
        Not if you're interested in the value cell of f instead of the
        function cell.
    Huh?  Doesn't (source-code f) return the source lambda expression for
    the function in the value cell of F?  SOURCE-CODE is just a function, so
    how could it access the function cell?  By the way, I may be
    misremembering the name we gave to the function that returns the
    original lambda expression; please correct me if so.
Arg, I must be asleep today.  Of course it does.  However I believe
that COMPILE wants a function not a source lambda expression.