[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue DEFCONSTANT-NOT-WIRED
- To: Gray@DSG.csc.ti.com
- Subject: Re: Issue DEFCONSTANT-NOT-WIRED
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 88 03:39 EDT
- Cc: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu, CL-Compiler@SAIL.Stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <2801165525-10237139@Kelvin>
- Supersedes: <881009033429.4.KMP@BOBOLINK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
[Sorry, an earlier version of this same message picked up
the wrong subject line. This is about DEFCONSTANT-NOT-WIRED,
not DEFCONSTANT-VALUE.]
If any kind of feature like this were added, I'd want to first
see a declaration (useful with both DECLARE and PROCLAIM) before
I thought about any macro encapsulation. I'd like to be able
to explain any DEFPARAMETER-xxx macro in terms of more primitive
functionality.