[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A reply and some more thoughts on specializing built-in

To: Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU
Subject: Re: A reply and some more thoughts on specializing built-in
From: Bobrow.pa@Xerox.ARPA
Date: 23 Sep 85 10:49 PDT
Cc: masinter.pa@Xerox.ARPA, cl-object-oriented-programming@SU-AI.ARPA
In-reply-to: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>'s message of Sun, 22 Sep 85 22:44 EDT

CommonLoops supports a predicate
(SPECIALIZABLE-P <function>).

The domain of functions in the silver book for which SPECIALIZABLE-P
returns T can start at () and increase over time as we understand 
the implementation impact of extending the list.

Proposals for an initial list of SPECIALIZABLE-P function from
the silver book is independent of any use of CommonLoops 
since as CommonLoops as defined does not require any such 
specializations.

Prev by Date: reply to Moon on slot shadowing
Next by Date: CommonLoops
Previous by thread: A reply and some more thoughts on specializing built-in
Next by thread: A reply and some more thoughts on specializing built-in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread