[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp

To: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Re: Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp
From: masinter.PA@Xerox.COM
Date: 11 Feb 88 10:00:26 PST
Cc: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU>, Common-Lisp-Object-System@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, sun!franz!smh@labrea.Stanford.EDU, rwk@AI.AI.MIT.EDU, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
In-reply-to: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM's message of Wed, 10 Feb 88 11:57 EST, <19880210165749.0.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

I've been out with the flu since last Friday afternoon (I thought it was just
jet lag...)

The issue SETF-FUNCTION-VS-SYMBOL was distributed and tentatively approved at
the November 1987 meeting of X3J13. 

The larger question of generalizing this beyond SETF functions, and beyond
merely DEFUN and FLET, seemed like it was open for another, larger, more
comprehensive proposal.


I'm still at home today and don't have easy access to all of the files. I'm
hoping I am not too late to get the mailing out for X3J13 of all of the new
issues.

Follow-Ups:
- Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp
  - From: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU>

References:
- Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp
  - From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp
Next by Date: Comments on most recent draft: Chap 1 and 2
Previous by thread: Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp
Next by thread: Status of SETF functions in Common Lisp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread