[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on CLOS draft 88-2

To: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Re: comments on CLOS draft 88-2
From: kempf@Sun.COM
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 88 11:33:08 -0700
Cc: "mike@gold-hill.com any day now" <mike%acorn@oak.lcs.mit.edu>, common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 08 Apr 88 14:01:00 -0400. <19880408180143.1.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

I also agree with Dave and Mike on this issue, except I'm not sure about
CHANGE-CLASS. Certainly, some way of getting a minimal subset would
make pushing CLOS more deeply into CL implementations more palatable.
I'm not sure, however, if it's possible at this late a date to do
so. It could probably be factored into a Chapter 2.5, between
the Metaobject Protocol and the Programmer Interface, and be
called something like "Environment Hooks", though hooks probably
isn't the right word.

	jak

References:
- comments on CLOS draft 88-2
  - From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: comments on CLOS draft 88-2
Next by Date: Re: comments on CLOS draft 88-2
Previous by thread: comments on CLOS draft 88-2
Next by thread: Re: comments on CLOS draft 88-2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread