Re: Plan Comments

[Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM]

    Date: Mon, 9 May 88 15:20 EDT
    From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

    Oh mumble, you're probably right.  So setf of find-class will work, but
    setf of find-method won't.  What about setf of find-generic-function, leave
    that out too?

What is find-generic-function?  I didn't see any message to suggest that
there would be such a thing.  I guess I must have missed something.  I
don't understand why symbol-function isn't enough?  If function
specifiers do get accepted into Common Lisp (editorial comment almost
elided), there will be some appropriate extension of symbol-function
which we will just use.
-------