[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: remote environments

To: Danny Bobrow <Bobrow.pa@Xerox.COM>
Subject: Re: remote environments
From: David N Gray <Gray@DSG.csc.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 89 17:02:18 CST
Cc: "David A. Moon" <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>, Common-Lisp-Object-System@SAIL.Stanford.edu
In-reply-to: Msg of 7 Mar 89 15:39 PST from Danny Bobrow <Bobrow.pa@Xerox.COM>
Sender: GRAY@Kelvin.csc.ti.com

> I agree.  And the metaobject protocol specifies that this
> definition can define a new method-combination class.
> An instance of this class is used in the DEFGENERIC to effect the
> method combination.  This implies an ability to instantiate
> a newly defined class at compile time to implement this capability.
> Another reason to answer the instntiation question YES.

I don't see where DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION has any option for
specifying the class of the method combination; doesn't it always
produce an instance of the pre-defined class METHOD-COMBINATION ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: remote environments
  - From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: class FUNCTION etc.
Next by Date: Re: issue CLOS-MACRO-COMPILATION, version 1
Previous by thread: Re: remote environments
Next by thread: Re: remote environments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread