CLIM mail archive
Using Processes in CLIM
> Isn't it the case that CLIM applications will likely only "port" to those
> implementations that are party to the CLIM consortium? I know that this
> isn't a "closed" consortium;
And I'm suggesting that care be taken to not effectively close the consortium
to implementations with a different tasking model.
> Someone can correct me if they really think that CLIM is likely to be working
> freely and well on, say, MACL 2.0 (the Apple Common Lisp).
I may be confused, but I seem to remember seeing mail a while ago about a MACL
port of CLIM being in the works.
Main Index |