Using Processes in CLIM

• To: kab@chestnut.com
• Subject: Using Processes in CLIM
• From: Jon L White <jonl%kuwait@lucid.com>
• Date: Mon, 1 Apr 91 18:52:20 PST
• Cc: clim@BBN.COM
• In-Reply-To: Kim Barrett's message of Mon, 1 Apr 91 17:55:08 EST <9104012255.AA00510@chestnut.com>

re: It would be rather awful if the use of documented and supposedly portable
    features of CLIM resulted in applications effectively only being portable 
    to a limited set of implementations which happen to provide a particular 
    tasking model.

Isn't it the case that CLIM applications will likely only "port" to those
implementations that are party to the CLIM consortium?  I know that this 
isn't a "closed" consortium; but not even every vendor with a Symbolics-
inspired multi-tasking design belongs to it.  Someone can correct me if 
they really think that CLIM is likely to be working freely and well on, 
say, MACL 2.0 (the Apple Common Lisp).


-- JonL --


0,,

• Using Processes in CLIM
• From: Kim Barrett <kab@chestnut.com>
• Using Processes in CLIM
• From: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>
• Using Processes in CLIM
• From: "Dennis L. Doughty" <doughty@fuji.ila.com>
• Using Processes in CLIM
• From: "Mark A. Son-Bell" <MAS-B@fuji.ila.com>

• Using Processes in CLIM
• From: Kim Barrett <kab@chestnut.com>

• Prev: Using Processes in CLIM
• Next: Using Processes in CLIM
• Index: CLIM Mailing list (5-Oct-90 to 31-Dec-91)
• Thread: CLIM Mailing list Index (5-Oct-90 to 31-Dec-91)