Re: contents of clim-library as of 92/09/09

• To: jcma@reagan.ai.mit.edu, nrb!keunen@relay.eu.net
• Subject: Re: contents of clim-library as of 92/09/09
• From: Scott McKay <SWM@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com>
• Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 11:12-0400
• Cc: clim@BBN.COM
• In-Reply-To: <19920914060948.6.JCMA@MORRISON.AI.MIT.EDU>

    Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 02:09 EDT
    From: "John C. Mallery" <jcma@reagan.ai.mit.edu>

    How come there is almost nothing in the library?  Nobody uses CLIM?  Nobody
    writes application independent code?  It's all a trade secret headed for the
    patent office?

I would also like to know the answers to these questions...  In my
opinion, a major reason for the success of X Windows is the sheer extent
of the stuff publicly available for X Windows.  I don't think CLIM can
be successful without a similar effort.  Of course, CLIM itself may be
too immature or limited to support such an effort.  I don't know, but I
would like to.

0,,

• Re: contents of clim-library as of 92/09/09
• From: Vincent Keunen <nrb!keunen@relay.eu.net>
• Re: contents of clim-library as of 92/09/09
• From: Simon Leinen <simon@lia.di.epfl.ch>

• Re: contents of clim-library as of 92/09/09
• From: "John C. Mallery" <jcma@reagan.ai.mit.edu>

• Prev: Re: contents of clim-library as of 92/09/09
• Next: reuse of windows
• Index: CLIM Mailing list (1-Sep-92 to 31-Dec-92)
• Thread: CLIM Mailing list Index (1-Sep-92 to 31-Dec-92)