CLIM mail archive
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
features
-
To: clim@BBN.COM
-
Subject: features
-
From: Peter Karp <pkarp>
-
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 93 10:02:40 PDT
I'd like to suggest that the CLIM vendors put some effort into
establishing a more standard, more useful features list (i.e.,
*features*) in the interest of facilitating portability among
platforms.
Obviously, :CLIM should be on the features list for all CLIM
implementations. It is version information that I want to address.
I suggest that all vendors ensure that symbols naming both the major
and minor version are on the features list, and that alpha/beta
designations be encoded separately.
For example, I suggest the following symbols be defined for the
following releases:
CLIM 1.1 :CLIM :CLIM-1 :CLIM-1.1
CLIM 2.0 alpha :CLIM :CLIM-2 :CLIM-2.0 :CLIM-2.0-alpha
CLIM 2.1 :CLIM :CLIM-2 :CLIM-2.1
My reasoning is that there will be certain systematic differences
between all the CLIM 1.X versions and all the CLIM 2.X versions, and
that we should be able to use #+CLIM-2 or #-CLIM-1 to designate such
dependencies in our code once, for all time. If I were to use
#+CLIM-2.0, or #-CLLIM-1.1 my code would do the wrong thing when I
tried to use it under CLIM-2.1 or CLIM-1.0.
I would specifically request that vendors NOT include symbols for
previous versions, e.g., a CLIM 2.0 implementation should not include
:CLIM-1.1. (I have seen this case occur, which is why I point this
out.)
This type of planning in the feature list will let us conditionalize
code at a much more accurate level of granularity. Code will be
portable across different sites and different platforms.
Peter
Follow-Ups:
Main Index |
Thread Index