Re: Semantics of flipping inks

• To: Scott McKay <swm@harlequin.com>
• Subject: Re: Semantics of flipping inks
• From: Nichael Cramer <ncramer@BBN.COM>
• Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 11:33:27 EDT
• Cc: Lawrence.G.Mayka@att.com, clim@BBN.COM

>From: Scott McKay <swm@harlequin.com>
>The simplest model, which also has the benefit of being accurate, is
>that drawing the same figure at the same place with the same flipping
>ink twice is a no-op.  

Please forgive a very tiny picked nit, but I just want to be sure I'm not
missing something subtle here:

When you say "the same flipping ink" does this imply that there can be more
than one "flipping-ink"?  Is there something other than what's bound on
clim:+FLIPPING-INK+? 

Thanks
Nichael

• Prev: Semantics of flipping inks
• Next: Semantics of flipping inks
• Index: CLIM Mailing list (1-Jun-94 to 30-Jun-95)
• Thread: CLIM Mailing list Index (1-Jun-94 to 30-Jun-95)