[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building 0812 on Sun4 solaris 2.4 with gcc 2.7.0?

> I would try them out, but I went and grabbed new versions from 
> which seem to work better.  The "explicit" problem is still there

It shouldn't be a show-stopper. How about adding "-Dexplicit=eksplicit"
to the CFLAGS?

> However, this raises another question.  Whenever I compile I get many
> warnings from gcc about volatile not doing what might be expected and
> using call-clobbered global registers (or something like that).

It's because CLISP plays dirty tricks with the stack pointer, for
efficiency. You can ignore the warnings.