[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CLISP 1996-07-22
- Subject: CLISP 1996-07-22
- From: werner@suse.de (Dr. Werner Fink)
- Date: 03 Mar 1997 22:13:27 +0100
- Cc: marcus@sysc.pdx.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
- Organization: S.u.S.E GmbH, Gebhardtstr. 2, 90762 Fuerth, Germany
- Posted-to: comp.lang.lisp
- Resent-date: 04 Mar 1997 22:12:06 +0100
- Resent-from: werner@suse.de (Dr. Werner Fink)
- Resent-message-id: <199703042112.WAA04570@boole.fs100.suse.de>
- Resent-to: clisp-list@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de.werner@suse.de
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted as well.
Hi,
I'm currently working on CLISP 1996-07-22, a Common Lisp
implementation done by Bruno Haible, Michael Stoll and Marcus Daniels.
The interpreter should run under Linux-2.0.29/ELF (gcc is 2.7.2.1,
binutils 2.7.0.3/2.7.0.9, libc 5.2.18/5.4.7 and higher).
On compiling the full set of possibilities I've detected that the
generational gc will not work under ELF ... a short test of this
can be done with the binary packages on
ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/lisp/clisp-linux-elf.tar.gz
by making the lisp interpreter with the full set of the possible
modules (make fromdir=full). On the first gc one gets the ``final'' result:
*** - handle_fault error2 ! address = 0x4010C00 not in [0x4000000,0x4000000) !
SIGSEGV cannot be cured. Fault address = 0x4010C00.
Segmentation fault
Ok, the intervall is really funny ;-) ... it's looks like a mistake in
the complicated cpp macros in lispbibl.d/lispbibl.c ...
Is there any fix avaible to get the generational garbage collection
stabel on work under ELF?
With -DNO_GENERATIONAL_GC the normal garbage collection works without
stopping during the tests with `full/lisp.run -M full/lispinit.mem'.
Only the 15 digit definition of PI and the usage of libm causes some
precision errors.
Note: I have to add the option -freg-struct-return to make the tests
during configure happy ... and I'm using readline, dynamic-ffi, and
after a few changes dynamic-modules.
BTW: One question more: What's the main difference of the gcl and the
CLIPS implementation of Common Lisp (speed, language and graphic
interfaces, function calls, ..., CLtL2 support, running maxima)?
Werner
--
Dr. Werner Fink -- S.u.S.E. GmbH, Gebhardtstr. 2, 90762 Fuerth, Germany
mail:werner@suse.de http://www.suse.de/~werner/ fax:+49-911-3206727
Click <A HREF="http://www.suse.de/~werner/">here</A>
------ Hiroshima '45 ----- Chernobyl '86 ----- Windows '95 -----