[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUI
- To: <clisp-list@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Subject: Re: GUI
- From: Alexey Goldin <goldin@spot.uchicago.edu>
- Date: 09 Sep 1997 13:06:57 -0500
- In-reply-to: Rodrigo Ventura's message of Tue, 9 Sep 97 20:54:33 +0200
- References: <9709091656.AA31464@isr.isr.ist.utl.pt>
Rodrigo Ventura <nuron@isr.isr.ist.utl.pt> writes:
> Tcl/Tk does *not* require X! That's precisely what make tcl/tk
> so wonderful. Tcl/tk code is 100% portable across mac, windows and
> unix. It only requires X under UNIX. The tcl/tk is distribuited for
> win32 as well as for unix. Official code from Sun.
I know everyone will disagree with me, but my small experience is that
Tcl/Tk is not very portable from version to version causing great pain
when new application require Tk4.1 when old one require Tk4.0. Is it a
great idea to distribute binaries for all platforms of interest with
statically linked libraries?
What is wrong with X only interface anyway?
(putting on asbestos underwear ;-)
Anyway, I think if you limit yourself to X only GUI then Qt or Gtk is
better alternative. Gtk is better as it does not require C++.
Qt is available for Windows (for $$$).
There is also wxwindows which is crossplatform (Windows, X, Mac) and
is used for GUI in DrScheme.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GUI
- From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr>
- Re: GUI
- From: Rodrigo Ventura <nuron@isr.isr.ist.utl.pt>
- References:
- Re: GUI
- From: Rodrigo Ventura <nuron@isr.isr.ist.utl.pt>