[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Typechecking
- To: Patrick H Dussud <DUSSUD@jenner.csc.ti.com>
- Subject: Re: Typechecking
- From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 88 10:34 PST
- Cc: common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Fcc: BD:>Gregor>mail>outgoing-mail-1.text
- In-reply-to: <2780084688-71255@Jenner>
- Line-fold: no
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 88 15:44:48 CST
From: Patrick H Dussud <DUSSUD@jenner.csc.ti.com>
Date: 05 Feb 88 1230 PST
From: Dick Gabriel <RPG@sail.stanford.edu>
Subject: Typechecking
Moon's message caused me to unwedge about what he was talking about. I am
happy to specify the behavior of CLOS when stores violate the :type option
as undefined. Do we have consensus?
I agree this.
Patrick.
This is fine with me as well.
-------