[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: MCL Framework & Directions
- To: D1104@applelink.apple.com, Info-MCL@cambridge.apple.com
- Subject: RE: MCL Framework & Directions
- From: "pierce" <email@example.com>
- Date: 24 Jun 92 18:51:34 U
>>If MCL's main purpose is to generate "shrink wrapped" commercial
>>then it needs a framework with at least the capabilities of MacApp and
I'm glad to see that someone else in the Lisp community recognizes the need for
an application framework for MCL that is as complete as Bedrock.
I believe that MCL also needs to provide a more robust foreign function
interface as well as an application framework that is common to MCL and C++.
This would allow the development of hybrid MCL<->C++ programs where MCL code
could be integrated with existing C++ code and C++ code developed by other
programming team members who prefer not to use MCL.
>My personal opinion is that "hardware resource" issues will soon
>disappear, and that the real issue, lack of a comprehensive class library with
>access to modern Macintosh features, will soon dominate. In my opinion MCL
>(and Dylan for that matter) without such a library will never expand beyond
I agree. I also think encouraging hybrid programming with a common framework
would speed the acceptance of using LISP for development.