[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Looking for MACLSP compatibility
- To: info-mcl@digitool.com
- Subject: Re: Looking for MACLSP compatibility
- From: alderson@netcom.com (Richard M. Alderson III)
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 20:21:46 GMT
- Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
- References: <gsharp.1.002E98CF@primenet.com>
- Reply-to: alderson@netcom.com
- Sender: owner-info-mcl@digitool.com
In article <gsharp.1.002E98CF@primenet.com> gsharp@primenet.com (Greg Sharp)
writes:
>There was a version of lisp in the early seventies called MACLSP - anyone
>heard of it? What current flavor of Lisp comes closest to it (has statements
>like "FEXPR" and "declare")?
I've answered this over in comp.lang.lisp--cross-posting your query would have
been a good idea.
No modern Lisp has FEXPRs. Common Lisp is the refined union of several MACLISP
descendants/dialects.
Note the followup.
--
Rich Alderson You know the sort of thing that you can find in any dictionary
of a strange language, and which so excites the amateur philo-
logists, itching to derive one tongue from another that they
know better: a word that is nearly the same in form and meaning
as the corresponding word in English, or Latin, or Hebrew, or
what not.
--J. R. R. Tolkien,
alderson@netcom.com _The Notion Club Papers_