[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A Dylan implemented on Common Lisp



kem@prl.ufl.edu (Kelly Murray) writes:
> If the CL->Dylan mapping isn't 100%, maybe we could
> push hard to get Dylan changed so it would be.  

Aren't there features that are in Lisps that will *never* be in Dylan,
because of the runtime overhead?  Isn't call/cc one such?