Re: A Dylan implemented on Common Lisp

[osiris@cs.utexas.edu (Rob Browning)]

>kem@prl.ufl.edu (Kelly Murray) writes:
>> If the CL->Dylan mapping isn't 100%, maybe we could
>> push hard to get Dylan changed so it would be.
>
>Aren't there features that are in Lisps that will *never* be in Dylan,
>because of the runtime overhead?  Isn't call/cc one such?

Heck, that one's not even in Common Lisp.  Although its a pretty cool
trick.  Gives Scheme advocates something to brag about :>

--Rob.