[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lisp Machine considered paragon

To: info-mcl@digitool.com
Subject: Re: Lisp Machine considered paragon
From: agleckle@monday.us.oracle.com (Arthur Gleckler)
Date: 15 Mar 1995 16:49:02 GMT
Organization: Oracle Corporation. Redwood Shores, CA
References: <3jdh0j$ib4@news.internex.net>, <3jirll$r0g@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
Sender: owner-info-mcl@digitool.com

In article <3k2j25$fom@larry.rice.edu> shriram@asia.cs.rice.edu (Shriram Krishnamurthi) writes:

   It's The UNIX-HATERS Handbook [sic], by Simson Garfinkel, Daniel Weise
   and Steve Strassmann.

"[sic]" [sic].  UNIX-HATERS is the name of the mailing list on which
the book is based.  There is nothing wrong with the title.

References:
- A Dylan implemented on Common Lisp
  - From: yost@rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu (Dave Yost)
- Re: A Dylan implemented on Common Lisp
  - From: sef@CS.CMU.EDU (Scott Fahlman)

Prev by Date: Re: why is tree-shaking hard?
Next by Date: Re: Using the compiler internally in distributed applications
Previous by thread: Re: Lisp Machine considered paragon
Next by thread: Re: A Dylan implemented on Common Lisp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread