Re: null LAMBDA bodies?

[Richard L. Bryan <RLB at MIT-MC>]

   I agree with KMP and DLW: empty LAMBDAs, PROGNs, etc. are sufficiently
consistent, well defined, and useful enough to include in the language.
   Unfortunately, the "implicit PROGN" of a COND clause is *NOT* subject
to the same generalization at all.  Somehow this seems to break all the
arguments here based on language consistency.