[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: &mumbles at all levels -- BIND-ARGS

Wasn't there a lot of discussion about 6 months to a year ago about
having LET accept &mumbles "at lots of levels"?  When you say
"at all levels" do you mean that BIND-ARGS will also destructure?
If progress on LET is going to be forever bogged down in the red tape, 
then how about doing BIND-ARGUMENTS at least one of the two ways 
proposed for destructuring (and since you are using the &optional words,
you have more-or-less selected the data-pattern format rather than the SETF