[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CLASS-DIRECT-INSTANCES?
- To: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Subject: Re: CLASS-DIRECT-INSTANCES?
- From: kanderso@dino.bbn.com
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 1991 17:08:01 PST
- Cc: mop.PARC@xerox.com
- In-reply-to: "Your message of Mon, 11 Feb 91 14:21:32 -0800. <9102112221.AA21364@kolyma>"
X-NS-Transport-ID: 08002008D0FD00074BC8
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 1991 14:21:32 PST
From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
Subject: CLASS-DIRECT-INSTANCES?
To: mop.PARC@xerox.com
The following reply to a query on comp.lang.clos give one more inch
of evidence for the utility of the phrases "direct instances" and
"indirect" or "derived" instances.
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 91 14:08:44 MST
From: egdorf@zaphod.lanl.gov (Skip Egdorf)
To: mikeb@ford-wdl1.ARPA
Cc: commonloops@cis.ohio-state.edu
In-Reply-To: (Michael H Bender's message of 11 Feb 91 18:18:40 GMT <MIKEB.91Feb11101840@wdl35.wdl.loral.com>
Subject: RE: accessing clos objects
. . .
I have implemented such a metaclass using the accessors for
class name-object mapping as a model. This scheme allows
(class-direct-instances class), (instance-name object),
(find-instance obect), and (setf (instance-name object) ...) on any
instances of classes of this new metaclass.
. . .
Out of curiosity, is this email disucssion list "dead" now? Is there
going to be any further discussion of the "pink" book?
-- JonL --
I've only hurd rumors about the "pink" book. What is it, and how do i
borrow a copy i can read?