[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: re: Aaron Larson's comments
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 89 10:22:59 -0800
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (31-Oct-1989 1315)
>However, the glossary is not consistent with this. There is no entry for
>"member", and the entry for "instance" is inconsistent with the terminology
>I thought we were using, is ungrammatical, and uses the word "element" in
>yet another new way (derived from "element of a set", but inconsistent with
>other uses of "element" in the specification; anyway "member of a set" is
>as good as "element of a set" so let's use it). Actually, in spite of the
>number of reviews it has been through the glossary is still pretty terrible.
Can you propose (or have you already) a definition for "member"?
The one earlier in the message from which you extracted the >-prefixed text.