[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vanilla Scheme code now or in future?

To: scheme@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: vanilla Scheme code now or in future?
From: mailrus!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!utgpu!utzoo!yunexus!oz@ohio-state.arpa (Ozan Yigit)
Date: Fri ,3 Mar 89 01:54:53 EDT
Organization: York U. Computing Services - Magic Group
References: <7336@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: scheme-request@mc.lcs.mit.edu

In article <7336@polya.Stanford.EDU> wilson@carcoar.Stanford.EDU writes:
>...  Other than the Gabriel benchmarks (translated by Will
>Clinger) and the examples from Abelson and Sussman (with Sussman),
>I only got one other program.
>

Would "scoops" fit your bill ?? It looks fairly clean (R3RS) and
would probably give your gc a good run. Would be ftp-available from
various places I am sure, or somebody can mail it to you.

happy scheming..	oz
-- 
... and I say to them, 	    		Usenet:    oz@nexus.yorku.ca
   `Where the hell were you        	......!uunet!utai!yunexus!oz
    when the page was blank?'		Bitnet: oz@[yulibra|yuyetti]
		Harlan Ellison  	Phonet: +1 416 736-5257x3976

References:
- vanilla Scheme code now or in future?
  - From: shelby!polya!carcoar.Stanford.EDU!wilson@decwrl.dec.com (Paul Wilson)

Prev by Date: Re: vanilla Scheme code now or in future?
Next by Date: Re: Unknown book reference
Previous by thread: Re: vanilla Scheme code now or in future?
Next by thread: vanilla Scheme code now or in future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread