[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scheme on a PC
In article <887@io.UUCP> chuck@io.UUCP (Chuck Cullen x4423) writes:
>Does anybody disagree that the TI implementation is currently the best
>solution available for Scheme on a pc?
I certainly don't. I've used it quite extensively (though not for
massive programs), and it satisfies my requirements quite well. V3.0
is pretty compatible with R^3S, and supports a fair number of
extensions (most of the worthwhile extensions are PC-specific). In
particular, it supports an external language interface which permits
you to invoke primitive procedures in any compilable language (I use
Turbo C). The package includes the interpreter/compiler, a debugger,
and an Emacs-compatible editor.
There are only two downsides to PC Scheme: (1) it's a bit sluggish on
my PC XT compatible (on an AT it's quite pleasant), and (2) it doesn't
produce standalone programs (therefore anyone who uses a PC Scheme
program has to have a licence for the interpreter). Still, for US$100,
it's very hard to beat.
TI's phone number (US only--us foreigners don't count) is 1-800-TI-PARTS.
____________ Vincent Manis | firstname.lastname@example.org
___ \ _____ The Invisible City of Kitezh | email@example.com
____ \ ____ Department of Computer Science | firstname.lastname@example.org
___ /\ ___ University of British Columbia | uunet!ubc-cs!manis
__ / \ __ Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1W5 | (604) 228-2394
_ / __ \ _ "Had George III been a Scheme programmer, he might have responded
____________ to Patrick Henry by freeing him and then killing him."
-- Michael Eisenberg